Dear Mr Frank,
Your terrorising persistence has paid off, I’m bound to admit, and I have read your MS.
In your obsessive determination to be heard, it may not have occurred to you that I am a busy man and that consequently I do not like to waste my time or have my time wasted by others. I am not the sort of editor who, impressed by a fellow’s rare ‘pluck’ or ‘spirit’ will forego the due process to which all other applicants must submit. Nor do I subscribe to that pernicious fallacy which convinces every idle dreamer in the cosmos that any ambition can be achieved as long as it is desired with sufficient earnestness. This is, tragically, a myth.
After reading your MS, to have merely filed it in my litter basket would have confirmed my time as wasted. Only by writing to you with an exhortation could that be avoided. My exhortation to you then, Mr Frank, is to cease in your bid to be a writer immediately. Your submission demonstrates quite clearly how inapt a course this is for you.
You must be made to understand that there are writers in this world and there are non-writers. There is a line in one of Gogol’s tales – The Portrait, I recall – which tells of a sad soul who came to know of “that terrible torment... when a weak talent strains to show itself and fails; that torment which passing beyond the border of dream, turns into a fruitless yearning... and which makes man capable of terrible evildoing”.
Over the years I have encountered not a few of these fragile souls – I consider it an occupational hazard – and while it is true that they would all profit immeasurably from such advice as I am giving to you, the fact is that I do not have the opportunity to respond to even a tithe of them. However your case is an extreme one, which compels me to take all the preventive action in my power.
A total inability to write literature does not obscure the poor deluded attempter’s sincerity and striving. I readily perceive these qualities in what you have written, Mr Frank, but this only makes the failure of your enterprise all the more poignant.
You must know that what you have produced is of no artistic merit at all.
You must know that what you have produced is of no artistic merit at all.
My dear man, you are setting yourself up for a life of unrelenting anguish if you persist in your hope of being a writer. Only once previously in modern times has a figure of such startling inability risen to literary prominence. His name was William McGonagall and he has been a figure of international derision for nearly 200 years. Surely this is not what you want for yourself?
The world is full of possibilities, and there are many endeavours to which you may apply yourself with resultant success and satisfaction. Literature is not one of them. And so, with your very best interests as my guide, I urge you to discontinue with this course of action. Your well-being, indeed your very sanity, may well depend on it.
Yours most sincerely,
P L S Vokov
F&F Chief Commissioning Editor
No comments:
Post a Comment